| Great discontent had long existed among the Italian subjects of Rome. They were not only oppressed, but they enjoyed no political privileges. They did not belong to the class of burgesses. With the view of extending the Roman franchise, a m... Read more of The Revolt Of Italy And The Social War at Ancient History.ca | InformationalPrivacy |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntelligenceCopying A DiamondEnumeration Of Objects In Pictures Guiding Principles In Choice And Arrangement Of Tests Superior Adult 1: Vocabulary (seventy-five Definitions 13500 Words) Giving Similarities; Two Things Dependence Of The Scale's Reliability On The Training Of The Examiner Giving The Date Alternative Test 2: Writing From Dictation Counting Thirteen Pennies Alternative Test 2: Counting The Value Of Stamps Average Adult Alternative Test 1: Repeating Twenty-eight Syllables Giving Definitions In Terms Of Use The Validity Of The Individual Tests Recording Responses Superior Adult 6: Ingenuity Test Repeating Five Digits Reversed Correlation Between I Q And The Teachers' Estimates Of The Children's Intelligence Pointing To Parts Of The Body Order Of Giving The Tests How The Scale Was Derived |
Naming Four CoinsPROCEDURE. Show a nickel, a penny, a quarter, and a dime, asking each time: "_What is that?_" If the child misunderstands and answers, "Money," or "A piece of money," we say: "_Yes, but what do you call that piece of money?_" Show the coins always in the order given above. SCORING. The test is passed if _three of the four_ questions are correctly answered. Any correct designation of a coin is satisfactory, including provincialisms like "two bits" for the 25-cent piece, etc. If the child changes his response for a coin, we count the second answer and ignore the first. No supplementary questions are permissible. REMARKS. Some of the critics of the Binet scale regard this test as of little value, because, they say, the ability to identify pieces of money depends entirely on instruction or other accidents of environment. The figures show, however, that it is not greatly influenced by differences of social environment, although children from poor homes do slightly better with it than those from homes of wealth and culture. The fact seems to be that practically all children by the age of 6 years have had opportunity to learn the names of the smaller coins, and if they have failed to learn them it betokens a lack of that spontaneity of interest in things which we have mentioned so often as a fundamental presupposition of intelligence. It is by no means a test of mere mechanical memory. This test was given a place in year VII of Binet's 1908 scale, the coins used being the 1-sou, 2-sous, 10-sous, and 5-franc pieces. It was omitted from the Binet 1911 revision and also from that of Goddard. Kuhlmann retains it in year VII. Others, however, have required all four coins to be correctly named, and when this standard is used the test is difficult enough for year VII. Germany has six coins up to and including the 1-mark piece, all of which could be named by 76 per cent of Bobertag's 7-year-olds. With the coins and the standard of scoring used in the Stanford revision the test belongs well in year VI. Next: Repeating Sixteen To Eighteen Syllables Previous: Comprehension Second Degree
Viewed 891 |
||||||||||||||||||||