InformationalPrivacy
| i'm walking along with a carnival. though the streets of rome. and i can sense him. i'm with someone, a friend. and i can see an archway. its big. i take them over and there is a door on the right that opens on a small room. only big enough to fit a ... Read more of us in rome at My Dreams.ca | Informational Privacy |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
IntelligenceGuiding Principles In Choice And Arrangement Of TestsGiving The Family Name Intelligence Tests Of The Feeble-minded Giving Similarities Three Things Are Intelligence Tests Superfluous? Copying A Diamond Supplementary Considerations Genius And Near Genius Arranging Five Weights Alternative Test 2: Repeating Twenty To Twenty-two Syllables Drawing Designs From Memory Dull Normals (i Q Usually 80 To 90) Nature Of The Stanford Revision And Extension Repeating Six Digits Reversed Alternative Test: Repeating Twelve To Thirteen Syllables Pointing To Parts Of The Body Comprehension First Degree Desirable Range Of Testing Material For Use In Testing Distinguishing Right And Left |
Nature Of The Stanford Revision And ExtensionAlthough the Binet scale quickly demonstrated its value as an instrument for the classification of mentally-retarded and otherwise exceptional children, it had, nevertheless, several imperfections which greatly limited its usefulness. There was a dearth of tests at the higher mental levels, the procedure was so inadequately defined that needless disagreement came about in the interpretation of data, and so many of the tests were misplaced as to make the results of an examination more or less misleading, particularly in the case of very young subjects and those near the adult level. It was for the purpose of correcting these and certain other faults that the Stanford investigation was planned. The writer wishes to acknowledge his very great indebtedness to Miss Grace Lyman, Dr. George Ordahl, Dr. Louise Ellison Ordahl, Miss Neva Galbreath, Mr. Wilford Talbert, Dr. J. Harold Williams, Mr. Herbert E. Knollin, and Miss Irene Cuneo for their cooeperation in making the tests on which the Stanford revision is chiefly based. Without their loyal assistance the investigation could not have been carried through. Grateful acknowledgment is also made to the many public school teachers and principals for their generous and invaluable cooeperation in furnishing subjects for the tests, and in supplying, sometimes at considerable cost of labor, the supplementary information which was called for regarding the pupils tested. Their contribution was made in the interest of educational science, and without expectation of personal benefits of any kind. Their professional spirit cannot be too highly commended. Next: Sources Of Data Previous: Some Avowed Limitations Of The Binet Tests
Viewed 851 |
||||||||||||||||||||
