| BY GEORGE L. RUFFIN GEORGE L. RUFFIN (1834-1885) the first Negro judge to be appointed in Massachusetts, graduated in Law from Harvard, 1869. He served in the legislature of Massachusetts two terms, and in the Boston Council two terms. [N... Read more of Crispus Attucks at Martin Luther King.ca | InformationalPrivacy |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntelligenceReliability Of Repeated TestsThe Game Of Patience Alternative Test 2: Repeating Twenty To Twenty-two Syllables Repeating Six Digits Reversed Repeating Six To Seven Syllables Keeping The Child Encouraged Alternative Test 2: Writing From Dictation Material For Use In Testing Repeating Five Digits Order Of Giving The Tests The Intelligence Of Retarded Children Usually Overestimated Giving Definitions Superior To Use Comprehension First Degree The Validity Of The Individual Tests Effects Of The Revision On The Mental Ages Secured Dissected Sentences Reading For Eight Memories Essential Nature Of The Scale Intelligence Tests For Vocational Fitness Desirable Range Of Testing |
Giving Similarities Three ThingsPROCEDURE. The procedure is the same as in VIII, 4, but with the following words:-- (a) _Snake_, _cow_, _sparrow_. (b) _Book_, _teacher_, _newspaper_. (c) _Wool_, _cotton_, _leather_. (d) _Knife-blade_, _penny_, _piece of wire_. (e) _Rose_, _potato_, _tree_. As before, a little tactful urging is occasionally necessary in order to secure a response. SCORING. _Three satisfactory responses out of five_ are necessary for success. Any real similarity is acceptable, whether fundamental or superficial, although the giving of fundamental likenesses is especially symptomatic of good intelligence. Failures may be classified under four heads: (1) Leaving one of the words out of consideration; (2) giving a difference instead of a similarity; (3) giving a similarity that is not real or that is too bizarre or far-fetched; and (4) inability to respond. Types (1), (3), and (4) are almost equally numerous, while type (2) is not often encountered at this level of intelligence. This test provokes doubtful responses somewhat oftener than the earlier test of giving similarities. Those giving greatest difficulty are the indefinite statements like "All are useful," "All are made of the same material," etc. Fortunately, in most of these cases an additional question is sufficient to determine whether the subject has in mind a real similarity. Questions suitable for this purpose are: "Explain what you mean," "In what respect are they all useful?" "What material do you mean?" etc. Of course it is only permissible to make use of supplementary questions of this kind when they are necessary in order to clarify a response which has already been made. While the amateur examiner is likely to have more or less trouble in deciding upon scores, this difficulty rapidly disappears with experience. The following samples of satisfactory and unsatisfactory responses will serve as a fairly adequate guide in dealing with doubtful cases:-- (a) _Snake_, _cow_, _sparrow_ _Satisfactory._ "All are animals" (or creatures, etc.). "All live on the land." "All have blood" (or flesh, bones, eyes, skin, etc.). "All move about." "All breathe air." "All are useful" (_plus_ only if subject can give a use which they have in common). "All have a little intelligence" (or sense, instinct, etc.). _Unsatisfactory._ "All have legs." "All are dangerous." "All feed on grain" (or grass, etc.). "All are much afraid of man." "All frighten you." "All are warm-blooded." "All get about the same way." "All walk on the ground." "All can bite." "All holler." "All drink water." "A snake crawls, a cow walks, and a sparrow flies" (or some other difference). "They are not alike." (b) _Book_, _teacher_, _newspaper_ _Satisfactory._ "All teach." "You learn from all." "All give you information." "All help you get an education." "All are your good friends" (_plus_ if subject can explain how). "All are useful" (_plus_ if subject can explain how). _Unsatisfactory._ "All tell you the news." "A teacher writes, and a book and newspaper have writing." "They are not alike." "All read." "All use the alphabet." (c) _Wool_, _cotton_, _leather_ _Satisfactory._ "All used for clothing." "We wear them all." "All grow" (_plus_ if subject can explain). "All have to be sent to the factory to be made into things." "All are useful" (_plus_ if subject can give a use which all have in common). "All are valuable" (_plus_ if explained). _Unsatisfactory._ "All come from plants." "All grow on animals." "All came off the top of something." "All are things." "They are pretty." "All spell alike." "All are furry" (or soft, hard, etc.). (d) _Knife-blade_, _penny_, _piece of wire_ _Satisfactory_. "All are made from minerals" (or metals). "All come from mines." "All are hard material." _Unsatisfactory._ "All are made of steel" (or copper, iron, etc.). "All are made of the same metal." "All cut." "All bend easily." "All are used in building a house." "All are worthless." "All are useful in fixing things." "All have an end." "They are small." "All weigh the same." "Can get them all at a hardware store." "You can buy things with all of them." "You buy them with money." "One is sharp, one is round, and one is long" (or some other difference). Such answers as "All are found in a boy's pocket," or "Boys like them," are not altogether bad, but hardly deserve to be called satisfactory. "All are useful" is _minus_ unless the subject can give a use which they have in common, which in this case he is not likely to do. Bizarre uses are also _minus_; as, "All are good for a watch fob," "Can use all for paper weights," etc. (e) _Rose_, _potato_, _tree_ _Satisfactory._ "All are plants." "All grow from the ground." "All have leaves" (or roots, etc.). "All have to be planted." "All are parts of nature." "All have colors." _Unsatisfactory._ "All are pretty." "All bear fruit." "All have pretty flowers." "All grow on bushes." "All are valuable" (or useful). "They grow close to a house." "All are ornamental." "All are shrubbery." REMARKS. The words of each series lend themselves readily to classification into a next higher class. This is the best type of response, but with most of the series it accounts for less than two thirds of the successes among subjects of 12-year intelligence. The proportion is less than one third for subjects of 10-year intelligence and nearly three fourths at the 14-year level. It would be possible and very desirable to devise and standardize an additional test of this kind, but requiring the giving of an essential resemblance or classificatory similarity. For discussion of the psychological factors involved in the similarities test, see VII, 5. Next: Induction Test: Finding A Rule Previous: Interpretation Of Pictures
Viewed 964 |
||||||||||||||||||||