| The insects most commonly attacking the apple are the codlin-moth, tent-caterpillar, canker-worm and borer. The codlin-moth lays its eggs on the fruit about the time of the falling of the blossoms, and the larvae when hatched eat into the young fruit... Read more of APPLE ENEMIES at Home Gardening.ca | InformationalPrivacy |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntelligenceInfluence Of The Subject's AttitudeProblem Of The Enclosed Boxes Differences Between Abstract Terms Repeating Six Digits Reversed The Use Of The Intelligence Quotient The Influence Of Coaching Using A Code Intelligence Tests Of Delinquents Superior Adult 6: Ingenuity Test Giving Sex Binet's Experiment On How Teachers Test Intelligence Feeble-mindedness (rarely Above 75 I Q) How The Scale Was Derived Special Characteristics Of The Binet-simon Method The Avoidance Of Fatigue Sex Differences Giving Differences From Memory Repeating Five Digits Reversed Pointing To Parts Of The Body Induction Test: Finding A Rule |
Guiding Principles In Choice And Arrangement Of TestsIn choosing his tests Binet was guided by the conception of intelligence which we have set forth above. Tests were devised which would presumably bring into play the various mental processes thought to be concerned in intelligence, and then these tests were tried out on normal children of different ages. If the percentage of passes for a given test increased but little or not at all in going from younger to older children this test was discarded. On the other hand, if the proportion of passes increased rapidly with age, and if children of a given age, who on other grounds were known to be bright, passed more frequently than children of the same age who were known to be dull, then the test was judged a satisfactory test of intelligence. As we have shown elsewhere,[13] practically all of Binet's tests fulfill these requirements reasonably well, a fact which bears eloquent testimony to the keen psychological insight of their author. In arranging the tests into a system Binet's guiding principle was to find an arrangement of the tests which would cause an average child of any given age to test "at age"; that is, the average 5-year-old must show a mental age of 5 years, the average 8-year-old a mental age of 8 years, etc. In order to secure this result Binet found that his data seemed to require the location of an individual test in that year where it was passed by about two thirds to three fourths of unselected children. It was in the assembling of the tests that the most serious faults of the scale had their origin. Further investigation has shown that a great many of the tests were misplaced as much as one year, and several of them two years. On the whole, the scale as Binet left it was decidedly too easy in the lower ranges, and too difficult in the upper. As a result, the average child of 5 years was caused to test at not far from 6 years, the average child of 12 years not far from 11. In the Stanford revision an effort has been made to correct this fault, along with certain other generally recognized imperfections. Next: Some Avowed Limitations Of The Binet Tests Previous: Other Conceptions Of Intelligence
Viewed 948 |
||||||||||||||||||||