| —Gossip —Our Words The Life Which is Tainted by the Habit of Speaking Unkind Words Falls Short of Its Highest Mission. THE LESSON—That the subtle practice of speaking carelessly concerning other people poisons many an ... Read more of The Brook at How to Draw.ca | Informational.caPrivacy |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntelligenceThe Influence Of CoachingThe Importance Of Tact Material For Use In Testing Giving Differences From Memory How To Find The I Q Of Adult Subjects Nature Of The Stanford Revision And Extension The Use Of The Intelligence Quotient Giving The Number Of Fingers Giving Similarities; Two Things Giving Differences Between A President And A King Finding Omissions In Pictures Detecting Absurdities Summary Of Changes Superior Adult 3: Repeating Eight Digits Naming Sixty Words The Validity Of The Intelligence Quotient Comprehension Second Degree Counting Backwards From 20 To 1 Getting Into Rapport Personality Of The Examiner |
Counting Thirteen PenniesPROCEDURE. The procedure is the same as in the test of counting four pennies (year IV, test 3). If the first response contains only a minor error, such as the omission of a number in counting, failure to tally with the finger, etc., a second trial is given. SCORING. The test is passed if there is _one success in two trials_. Success requires that the counting should tally with the pointing. It is not sufficient merely to state the number of pennies without pointing, for unless the child points and counts aloud we cannot be sure that his correct answer may not be the joint result of two errors in opposite directions and equal; for example, if one penny were skipped and another were counted twice the total result would still be correct, but the performance would not satisfy the requirements. REMARKS. Does success in this test depend upon intelligence or upon schooling? The answer is, intelligence mainly. There are possibly a few normal 6-year-old children who could not pass the test for lack of instruction, but children of this age usually have enough spontaneous interest in numbers to acquire facility in counting as far as 13 without formal teaching. Certainly, inability to do so by the age of 7 years is a suspicious sign unless the child's environment has been extraordinarily unfavorable. On the other hand, feeble-minded adults of the 5-year level usually have to have a great deal of instruction before they acquire the ability to count 13, and many of them are hardly able to learn it at all. So much does our learning depend on original endowment. Binet originally placed this test in year VII, but moved it to year VI in 1911. All the statistics, without exception, show that this change was justified. Bobertag says that nearly all 7-year-olds who are not feeble-minded can pass it, a statement with which we can fully agree. Next: Comprehension Second Degree Previous: Finding Omissions In Pictures
Viewed 472 |
||||||||||||||||||||