|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntelligenceRecording ResponsesFinding Omissions In Pictures Using Three Words In A Sentence Repeating Five Digits Average Adult Alternative Test 1: Repeating Twenty-eight Syllables Very Superior Intelligence (i Q 120 To 140) Distinguishing Right And Left Giving Similarities Three Things Alternative Test 1: Repeating Six Digits Giving The Date The Ball-and-field Test (superior Plan) Repeating Sixteen To Eighteen Syllables Interpretation Of Pictures Comparison Of Weights Correlation Between I Q And The Teachers' Estimates Of The Children's Intelligence The Importance Of Tact Alternative Test 2: Counting The Value Of Stamps Frequency Of Different Degrees Of Intelligence Discrimination Of Forms Other Fallacies In The Estimation Of Intelligence |
Counting Four PenniesPROCEDURE. Place four pennies in a horizontal row before the child. Say: "_See these pennies. Count them and tell me how many there are. Count them with your finger, this way_" (pointing to the first one on the child's left)--"_One_"--"_Now, go ahead._" If the child simply gives the number (whether right or wrong) without pointing, say: "_No; count them with your finger, this way_," starting him off as before. Have him count them aloud. SCORING. The test is passed only if the counting tallies with the pointing. It is not sufficient merely to state the correct number without pointing. REMARKS. Contrary to what one might think, this is not to any great extent a test of "schooling." Practically all children of this age have had opportunity to learn to count as far as four, and with normal children the spontaneous interest in number is such that very few 4-year-olds, even from inferior social environment, fail to pass the test. While success requires more than the ability to repeat the number names by rote, it does not presuppose any power of calculation or a mastery of the number concepts from one to four. Many children who will readily say, mechanically, "one, two, three, four," when started off, are not able to pass the test. On the other hand, it is not expected that the child who passes will also necessarily understand that four is made up of two two's, or four one's, or three plus one, etc. Binet, Goddard, and Kuhlmann place this test in the 5-year group, but three separate series of tests made for the Stanford revision, as well as nearly all the statistics available from other sources, show that it belongs at 4 years. Next: Copying A Square Previous: Discrimination Of Forms
Viewed 3409 |
||||||||||||||||||||
