| Many respondents complained about vivid dreams. Some explained that dreams were so vivid that they had problems to separate waking and dreaming realities. No doubt that fear to be labeled as (slightly) insane also is an issue. Two respondent expresse... Read more of Vivid dreams at My Dreams.ca | Informational.caPrivacy |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntelligenceScattering Of SuccessesSpecial Characteristics Of The Binet-simon Method The Validity Of The Intelligence Quotient Influence Of The Subject's Attitude Repeating Six To Seven Syllables Recording Responses Defining Abstract Words Sources Of Data Naming Sixty Words Superior Adult 4: Repeating Thought Of Passage Alternative Test: Forenoon And Afternoon Scoring Distinguishing Right And Left Intelligence Tests For Vocational Fitness Are Intelligence Tests Superfluous? Alternative Test 2: Repeating Three Digits Reversed Material For Use In Testing Repeating Six Digits Reversed The Use Of The Intelligence Quotient Reliability Of Repeated Tests |
Using A CodePROCEDURE. Show the subject the code given on the accompanying form. Say: "_See these diagrams here. Look and you will see that they contain all the letters of the alphabet. Now, examine the arrangement of the letters. They go_ (pointing) _a b c, d e f, g h i, j k l, m n o, p q r, s t u v, w x y z. You see the letters in the first two diagrams are arranged in the up-and-down order_ (pointing again), _and the letters in the other two diagrams run in just the opposite way from the hands of a clock_ (pointing). _Look again and you will see that the second diagram is drawn just like the first, except that each letter has a dot with it, and that the last diagram is like the third except that here, also, each letter has a dot. Now, all of this represents a code; that is, a secret language. It is a real code, one that was used in the Civil War for sending secret messages. This is the way it works: we draw the lines which hold a letter, but leave out the letter. Here, for example, is the way we would write 'spy?'_" Then write the word _spy_, pointing out carefully where each letter comes from, and emphasizing the fact that the dot must be used in addition to the lines in writing any letter in the second or the fourth diagram. Illustrate also with _war_. Then add: "_I am going to have you write something for me; remember now, how the letters go, first_ (pointing, as before) _a b c, d e f, g h i, then j k l, m n o, p q r, then s t u v, then w x y z. And don't forget the dots for the letters in this diagram and this one_" (pointing). At this point, take away the diagrams and tell the subject to write the words _come quickly_. Say nothing about hurrying. The subject is given a pencil, but is allowed to draw only the symbols for the words _come quickly_. He is not permitted to reproduce the entire code and then to copy the code letters from his reproduction. SCORING. The test is passed if the words are written in _six minutes and without more than two errors_. Omission of a dot counts as only a half error. REMARKS. It is not easy to analyze the mental functions which contribute to success in the code test. Contrary to what might be supposed, success does not necessarily depend upon getting and retaining a visual picture of the diagrams. Kinaesthetic imagery will answer the purpose just as well, or the original visual impression may even be translated at once into auditory-verbal imagery and remembered as such. The significance of the test must be expressed in other terms than the kind of imagery it may happen to bring into play. Healy and Fernald describe the task of writing a code sentence without copy as one which requires "close attention and steadiness of purpose." They also emphasize the fact that the attention must be directed inward, since there is no object of interest before the senses and since no special stimulus to attention is offered by the experimenter. Observations we have made on subjects during the test confirm this view as to the factors involved. That inability to remember the code as a whole is not a common cause of failure is shown by the fact that subjects above 12-year intelligence who have failed on the test are nearly always able to reproduce the diagrams and insert the letters in their proper places. To give the code form of a given letter without copy, however, makes a much heavier demand on attention. Nearly all subjects find it necessary to trace the code form, in imagination, from the beginning up to each letter whose code form is sought. Subjects of superior intelligence, however, sometimes hit upon the device of remembering the position of the individual key letters e.g. (the first letter of each figure) from which, as a base, any desired letter form may be quickly sought out. The test correlates well with mental age, but for some reason not apparent it is passed by a larger percentage of high-school pupils than unschooled adults of the same mental level. The code test was first described by Healy and Fernald in their "Tests for Practical Mental Classification." The authors gave no data, however, which would indicate the mental level to which the test belongs. Dr. Goddard incorporated it in year XV of his revision of the Binet scale, but also fails to give statistics. The location given the test in the Stanford revision is based on tests of nearly 500 individuals ranging from a mental level of 12 years to that of "superior adult." It appears that the test is considerably more difficult than most had thought it to be. Next: Average Adult Alternative Test 1: Repeating Twenty-eight Syllables Previous: Repeating Six Digits Reversed
Viewed 470 |
||||||||||||||||||||